Cardiology Coding Alert

Reader Questions :

Follow Face-to-Face Rule for New vs. Established

Question: We hired a new cardiologist for our practice to replace another physician who left. The new physician thinks he should be able to bill 99205 because patients who have been coming to us for years are new to him. Should we be billing new or established E/Ms? Iowa Subscriber Answer: Generally speaking, what you describe is not a new-patient scenario, and 99201-99205 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new patient ...) is not appropriate. "New patient" means a patient who has not received any professional services, such as an E/M service or other face-to-face service (like a surgical procedure) from the physician or physician group practice -- with the same physician specialty -- within the past three years. (Remember to check whether your payer considers EPs to be the same specialty as cardiologists.) So, for instance, reading an ECG in the absence of an E/M [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All