Cardiology Coding Alert
Reader Questions:
Ensure Proper Payment by Using 93970 for Bilateral
Published on Tue Aug 11, 2015
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Cardiology Coding Alert
- Coding Challenge:
Try Your Hand at 4 Cardiac Cath Scenario Questions
See if you can catch every applicable modifier. Coding a claim requires a big picture [...] - News You Can Use:
CMS's 'Clarifying Questions and Answers' Is a Must Read to Boost ICD-10 Understanding
Wonder no more about ‘family of codes’ for Part B reporting purposes. CMS and the [...] - ICD-10-CM:
3 Characters in ICD-10 Take the Place of Syncope Code 780.2
Check out the Excludes1 note to keep your coding on track. Learning ICD-10’s replacement for [...] - Audits:
Prioritize Place of Service Coding or Risk OIG Scrutiny
Don’t make this $10,000 angioplasty mistake. In a recent audit, the OIG found that MACs [...] - Modifiers:
Append Modifier GA to Show You've Got ABN Requirements Under Control
Not sure how modifiers GA and GZ differ? Issuing the ABN is the key. Distinguishing [...] - You Be the Coder:
Take This Multi-Part Pacemaker Challenge
Question: How should I code this? The cardiologist replaced a dual-lead pacemaker generator for end of [...] - Reader Questions:
Ensure Proper Payment by Using 93970 for Bilateral
Question: Does it matter whether we report 93971-LT, 93971-RT for a service instead of 93970? Connecticut [...] - Reader Questions:
Code EP Components in Rare Cases
Question: How should I bill for a ventricular stimulation and right ventricle recording with the induction [...]
View All
