Cardiology Coding Alert
Reader Questions:
Don’t Ignore Medical Record Reviews
Published on Wed Aug 24, 2022
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Cardiology Coding Alert
- Atherosclerosis:
Follow 3 Handy Tips to Simplify Your Atherosclerosis Coding
Report 92943 and +92944 for chronic total occlusion. In the session “Cardiovascular Pathophysiology Diagnostics and [...] - Hypertension, Part 1:
Answer 6 FAQs to Ensure Clean Hypertension Claims
Hint: Report a secondary code from category N18- when reporting from category I12-. Reporting the [...] - MPFS:
Watch Out for Decreased Conversion Factor in 2023 MPFS Proposed Rule
Remember: CMS uses RBRVS to determine how much practitioners will be paid. On July 7, [...] - You Be the Coder:
Don’t Forget Modifier on This Holter Monitoring Claim
Question: My cardiologist has been performing Holter monitoring. I see in the code descriptors for 93224-93227 [...] - Reader Questions:
Don’t Ignore Medical Record Reviews
Question: Since the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) is still ongoing, does our practice really need [...] - Reader Questions:
Consider Timeframe for These Percutaneous Codes
Question: Is there a timeframe for when we can report 92941 versus 92928 or 92920? North [...] - Reader Questions:
Review Handy Modifier Advice
Question: I’m trying to figure out when to use modifiers 62, 66, 80, and AS. Can [...]
View All
