Cardiology Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Decipher Private-Payer Mystery Edits

Question: I follow Correct Coding Initiative edits, but some insurers don't follow these guidelines. Why not?Virginia SubscriberAnswer: You're right. Some insurers follow CCI edits, but some don't. This is strictly up to each payer and their stated goals for coverage. Those who don't use CCI edits may instead follow McKesson edits. McKesson is a clinical editing system that is not in a public domain, and therefore you are not given specific information about what edits your payer is applying each time you bill. Most of the time, you learn what they are by following the denial patterns.For instance, Aetna follows McKesson edits and generally does not alter the edits that come with the package. CIGNA does as well, but you may find reimbursement after a review. And you may successfully overturn bundles with Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) depending on the representative you talk to. But other payers, such as UnitedHealthCare, do not follow McKesson edits at all. These insurers have developed internal edits that you may also not know about in advance.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All