Cardiology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Prep for New National JW Rule
Published on Fri Jun 10, 2016
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Cardiology Coding Alert
- Denial Prevention:
80 Percent of Vascular Study Claims Are Wrong, Reveals NGS Review
Would your duplex scan coding pass the test? If you report non-invasive vascular studies, it's [...] - ICD-10-CM:
Sequence Z Code First on These CABG Mapping Claims for NGS
Linking scans to preprocedure encounter codes is the key to compliant coding. You already know [...] - Code Edits:
Need Another Reminder You Can't Report INR Codes? CCI 22.1 Answers the Call
Reporting 99363, 99364, or G0250 with these inpatient E/Ms will trigger a denial. Medicare doesn’t [...] - Modifier:
Turn to Modifier 32 When Outside Party Has Power to Mandate a Service
Don’t assume this modifier is for E/M only. In some cases, your cardiologist may perform [...] - You Be the Coder:
Put Prolonged QTc Question to Rest
Question: Which ICD-10-CM code should I use for a prolonged QTc interval? Indiana Subscriber Answer: The correct [...] - Reader Question:
Prep for New National JW Rule
Question: I heard there's finally a single rule about how to use modifier JW. What is [...] - Reader Question:
Make Room for New Echo Cat. III Code
Question: Are there any Category III codes expected for cardiology this July? South Dakota Subscriber Answer: One [...] - Reader Question:
Check 93641 Modifier 51 Exempt Status
Question: I have a question from the May 2016, vol. 19, no. 5, Cardiology Coding Alert, [...] - Reader Question:
Base POS on Face-to-Face Setting, Usually
Question: If I’m coding for the PC of a test performed in an outpatient hospital, do [...]
View All
