Cardiology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Master Importance of Medical Necessity
Published on Thu Nov 21, 2019
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Cardiology Coding Alert
- CPT® 2020 Guidelines:
Here's How to Effectively Use New Pericardium and Aortic Graft CPT® 2020 Guidelines
Hint: Don’t report 99473 more than once per device. As you learned in the article [...] - Case Study:
Solve This Cardiac Stress Test Scenario to Perfect Your Reporting Smarts
Use the scenario details to arrive at an answer. A reader recently wrote in with [...] - Quiz:
5 Quick Questions Answer Your Medicare Signature Conundrums
Remember: Consider a signature log or attestation statement if the provider’s signature is illegible. If [...] - You Be the Coder:
Sharpen Transtelephonic Pacemaker Evaluation Skills
Question: My cardiologist performed a 93293 service. What are the rules for the monitoring period [...] - Reader Question:
Dial Into New CPT® 2020 Online E/M Code
Question: One of my colleagues said that CPT® 2020 will delete current online E/M code [...] - Reader Question:
Mark Down ICD-10 2020 Atrial Fibrillation Codes
Question: Did ICD-10 2020 add any new codes for atrial fibrillation? If so, what are [...] - Reader Question:
Master Importance of Medical Necessity
Question: I was wondering if you could help me understand the correct definitions for medical necessity? [...] - Reader Question:
Follow This Advice When Reporting Multiple Physicians for ECMO
Question: I’m currently coding a case where two physicians were involved during an ECMO/ECLS procedure. [...]
View All
