Cardiology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Beware of E/M Code Choice Patterns

Question: We recently finished our first internal audit and found a potential issue: One of the doctors told me that they only chose level 99212 when it is a follow-up from a previous visit. He chooses levels 99213 and above for everything else. I do not believe it is that simple because I thought even if it was not a follow-up visit, something like a minor problem might warrant 99212. Can you advise?

Washington Subscriber

Answer: You are correct. Not only can a follow-up problem-oriented visit for an established patient warrant a code other than 99212, but your coding should never hinge solely on whether a problem is new. The selection of an E/M level should be based on documentation and medical necessity.

If you have documentation that supports a comprehensive history and a comprehensive exam, but you are sending the patient home with a plan of rest and symptomatic treatment with mention of over-the-counter medications, that is a low level of medical decision-making, which typically would not warrant billing 99214 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: A detailed history; A detailed examination; Medical decision making of moderate complexity. Counseling and/or coordination of care with other physicians, other qualified health care professionals, or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem[s] and the patient’s and/or family’s needs. Usually, the presenting problem[s] are of moderate to high severity. Typically, 25 minutes are spent face-to-face with the patient and/or family).

When physicians announce that they will only choose a particular level of service for a certain type of patient, that is typically a learned behavior which can hurt the physician in both ways (undercoding and overcoding). A “minor problem” could warrant a 99212 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: A problem focused history; A problem focused examination; Straightforward medical decision making. Counseling and/or coordination of care with other physicians, other qualified health care professionals, or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem[s] and the patient’s and/or family’s needs. Usually, the presenting problem[s] are self limited or minor. Typically, 10 minutes are spent face-to-face with the patient and/or family). But it could also warrant a higher level code depending on the patient’s other coexisting conditions, symptoms, and history. Each case should be coded individually based on the documentation.

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All