Cardiology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
99304 Is OK for Specialists, Too
Published on Tue Feb 12, 2013
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Cardiology Coding Alert
- CPT® 2013:
37211-37214 Focus on Initial, Subsequent, and Final Day for Non-Coronary Thrombolysis Coding
Claim checkpoint: Catheter exchanges and follow-up studies are bundled into the new codes. Thrombolysis [...] - Coding Guidelines:
Polish Your Thrombolysis Claims With These Tips
Caution: The CPT® guidelines may not be where you expect them. To help in the [...] - Peripheral Vascular:
Streamline Your Selection of the New Non-Coronary Thrombolysis Codes
Remember to watch arterial or venous for first day’s code. In 2013, your coding for [...] - Vascular Coding:
36226 on Both Sides? Here's What to Do
Plus: Discover which services are reportable in addition to the new cervicocerebral angiography codes. For [...] - ICD-10-CM:
I25.10 Is an Inexact Match for Unspecified Cardiovascular Disease
But ICD-10 notes let you know this is the best option once 429.2 is obsolete. [...] - You Be the Coder:
Pick the Code for This SPECT Exam
Question: How should I report the interpretation of nuclear images performed for a SPECT Cardiolite [...] - Reader Question:
33361 Now Appears in CMS's TAVR Policy
Question: Does the creation of the new TAVR codes change Medicare’s coverage policy for the [...] - Reader Question:
33215 Has an MUE of 2
Question: When two electrodes are repositioned (atrial and ventricular), same session, would you code 33215 [...] - Reader Question:
99304 Is OK for Specialists, Too
Question: Our doctors were asked to consult at a nursing home. They have never gone [...] - Reader Question:
414.01 Answers Native Vessel CAD Question
Question: Based on the documentation for the following scenario, can you please tell us the [...]
View All
