Cardiology Coding Alert

News You Can Use:

CCI Rescinds Controversial Policy Restricting Only One PV Intervention Per Vessel

Watch out: You will still have problems with the reinstated policy, experts sayNo more will you have to limit your cardiologist's peripheral vascular (PV) intervention to one vessel, when the initial intervention (for instance, stent, atherectomy and angioplasty) failed.Many societies, including the American College of Cardiology, protested Medicare's bundling policy, and persistence paid off -- literally.Niles Rosen, MD, Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) medical director, announced the change in an Aug. 6th letter to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), AMA and coding consultant Stacy Gregory, RCC, CPC, of Tacoma, Wash.-based Gregory Medical Consulting Services, in response to letters about the controversial policy."This response is extremely significant because it provides an answer to the question many of us were left asking after Oct. 2007: Do we continue to bill for these services despite Medicare's revised guidelines in the hopes they will be reversed, or do we eliminate billing for angioplasty/atherectomy/stent in the same peripheral vessel as a result of this CCI policy?" Gregory says.CCI Plugs In Old VerbiageCCI will temporarily reinstate old language in the next release (version 14.3, published on Oct. 1, 2008). It will state:"When percutaneous angioplasty of a vascular lesion is followed at the same session by a percutaneous or open atherectomy, generally due to insufficient improvement in vascular flow with angioplasty alone, only the most comprehensive atherectomy that was performed (generally the open procedure) is reported (see sequential procedure policy, Chapter I, Section M)."Note: The change is retroactive to Oct. 2007. However, Gregory recommends a "wait and see" approach to following up and re-billing of claims."First, the change won't be effective until Oct. 1, so you need to wait to resubmit claims until after this date," Gregory says. "Also, I get the impression we have not heard the last about this issue from CMS and CCI, as the letter says CMS will temporarily reinstate the new paragraph. It seems like they are still in the process of finalizing their decision."Indeed, the Aug. 6th letter indicates, "CMS remains concerned about this issue and has encouraged national healthcare organizations to work with other interested parties to address coding for reporting atherectomy, angioplasty and stenting in non-coronary arteries." Translation: Make sure to keep reading the Cardiology Coding Alert for updates.You Won't Find All Good NewsBe forewarned: This old policy remains problematic. In a sense, "we are back where we started; we have a vague policy that people will interpret in numerous ways," says Jim Collins, CPC-CARDIO, ACS-CA, CHCC, president of The Cardiology Coalition in Saratoga Springs, N.Y.Like before, "this policy excerpt fails to address the deployment of stents; it only suggests you should not separately report an angioplasty if followed by percutaneous or open atherectomy," Collins points out.
 Even if the [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All