As part of its proposed revisions to the 2003 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS has recommended a number of changes to the place-of-service indicators (e.g., 11 for the office, 22 for outpatient hospital) that could affect cardiology coding. Now, cardiology coders are using several place-of-service indicators for which there is no site-of-service (facility versus nonfacility) designation. The CMS proposal would assign a site-of-service designation to these indicators, as well as revise several existing site-of-service designations. Under the resource-based practice expense methodology, CMS distinguishes practice expense relative value units (RVUs) for nonfacility and facility settings. According to CMS publication 1204-P, "This distinction is needed because of the higher resource costs to the physician in the non-facility setting when the practitioner typically bears the cost of the resources associated with the service. In addition, the distinction ensures that we do not make a duplicate payment for any of the practice expenses incurred in performing a service for a Medicare beneficiary." When the beneficiary is a facility patient, Medicare reimburses the facility for the clinical staff, supplies and equipment while the practitioner receives a generally lower facility practice expense rate. Therefore, changes to the site of service will directly affect physician reimbursement. For 2003, CMS has recommended that the following be considered facility settings:
CMS has designated the following nonfacility settings: Note: If a mobile unit provides a service to a facility patient, report the appropriate place-of-service code for the facility. All other place-of-service indicators not specifically mentioned are designated nonfacility site-of-service locations. For the complete text of CMS 1204-P and a list of current place of service indicators, visit the CMS Web site at http://www.cms.gov/physicians/pfs/default.asp.