Cardiology Coding Alert

Maximize Mod 59 Payment by Following CPT 2008 Guidelines

Ask, 'Did intervention occur on different coronary artery?'If you're still treating modifier 59 as a catchall, especially after CPT 2008 clarified its use, you could be attracting unwanted regulatory attention.Watch out: "Modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) is the Prednisone of modifiers," says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC-OTO, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I, CHCC, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions, a coding and reimbursement consulting firm in Tinton Falls, N.J. It can be of great help, but it can be very dangerous at the same time.Keep your modifier 59 use on the up-and-up by following these updated guidelines.Qualify as Different Site, SessionConsultants previously stressed that you should restrict your modifier 59 use to certain circumstances. CPT 2008 now makes that guidance clear. The modifier's revised descriptor in Appendix A now specifies that "Documentation must support:• different session• different procedure or surgery• different site or organ system• separate incision or excision• separate lesion• separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries)."Some coding consultants previously suggested that the above scenarios in Appendix A were merely examples, not qualifying circumstances. They pointed to the modifier's description of circumstances that "may represent a different session ..." as evidence. The change to "Documentation must support ..." closes this loophole."I have always felt modifier 59's use was limited to those examples," Cobuzzi says. "The 2008 CPT guidelines make the modifier's guidelines more crystal-clear."Simplified: The six examples boil down to "the two issues of different sites or operative sessions," Cobuzzi says. Ask, "Does the provider perform the two normally bundled procedures at different anatomical sites or operative sessions?" If the codes you report on the claim don't meet this critical criteria, modifier 59 does not apply, and you should not use it.Learn From a Modifier 59 ExampleHere's an example that meets modifier 59's different- site criteria. If your cardiologist catheterizes the left and right common carotid arteries, you will report 36216 (Selective catheter placement, arterial system; initial second-order thoracic or brachiocephalic branch, within a vascular family) for the right common carotid (RCC) and 36215 (Selective catheter placement, arterial system; each first-order thoracic or brachiocephalic branch, within a vascular family) for the left common carotid (LCC). If you don't put modifier 59 on 36215, your payers will assume that both codes apply to the same vascular family.Use 59 When No Other Modifier AppliesBefore using modifier 59, remember it is the modifier of last resort. "As described for modifier 59 without revision, precaution is given to not use modifier 59 when another already established modifier is appropriate, unless no more descriptive modifier is available, and so long as it best explains the circumstances," says Debra Pierce, MD, MBA, CPC, founder and managing member of Pierce MD Consulting LLC in Rockbridge, Ohio.Example: A [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.