Cardiology Coding Alert

CCI 8.1 Removes Inappropriate Edit for Electrophysiology Studies

Version 8.1 of the national Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) (effective April 1, 2002-June 30, 2002) deletes an inappropriate edit that defeated the purpose of a CPT revision for two electrophysiology (EP) codes.

In version 8.0 (effective Jan. 1-March 31, 2002), CCI bundled a primary code (93620, Comprehensive electrophysiologic evaluation with right atrial pacing and recording, right ventricular pacing and recording, His bundle recording, including insertion and repositioning of multiple electrode catheters with induction or attempted induction of arrhythmia) into its add-on components, +93621 ( with left atrial pacing and recording from coronary sinus or left atrium [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]) and +93622 ( with left ventricular pacing and recording [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]). As of Jan. 1, 2002, CPT revised these three codes. Code 93620 is no longer an extension of 93619 (... without induction or attempted induction of arrhythmia) and now stands alone. More significant, +93621 and +93622 were changed to add-on codes that may be reported in addition to 93620. Previously, +93621 and +93622 were comprehensive codes that incorporated all the elements of 93620 as well as left atrial or left ventricular study. Refile Denied EPClaims The CPT change resolved a long-standing issue about how EP studies that also involve the left atrium and/or the left ventricle should be coded. Although CCI bundled 93620 with +93621 and +93622, some EP physicians argued that, given the tiny increase in fees for performing the left-side study, both right-side (93620) and left-side (+93621 and/or +93622) studies should be separately reported.

"By changing +93621 and +93622 to add-on codes, the issue was supposed to go away," says Belinda Inabinet, CPC, technical support and coding manager at South Carolina Heart Center, a 21-physician practice in Columbia, S.C. "But CCI wasn't notified in time to correct the problem for the first-quarter edits, so they were not removed, and some Medicare and other carriers continued to deny the main procedure." Other carriers, she adds, allowed the claim to go through on appeal. After they were designated as add-on codes, CMS revised their value. In 2001, before the change, +93621-26 ( Professional component) was assigned 21.20 relative value units (RVUs), whereas +93622-26 was valued at 21.32 RVUs. As add-on codes, the values have been drastically reduced (+93621, 3.13 RVUs; +93622, 5.07 RVUs). The failure to remove the edit in 8.0 results in the denial of 93620-26 and its 17.01 RVUs, leaving the EP physician with payment only for 93621-26 and/or 93622-26, a fraction of the appropriate amount for performing the left- and right-side EP studies. The edits no longer appear in version 8.1 and do not apply as of April 1, says Linda Dietz, RHIA, CCS, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more