Cardiology Coding Alert

Case Study:

Submitting an LV Lead Placement Claim Could Set You Up for a Headache

Learn how your EPs should best document class III or class IV heart failure When you're reading your carrier's local coverage determinations, looking at the written list of conditions that the carrier will cover for a particular procedure is sometimes not enough.
 
Take a lesson from the following case study on left ventricular lead insertion for the purpose of biventricular pacing (33224-33226). See How This Scenario Hit a Roadblock Scenario: Your practice submits a claim for +33225 (Insertion of pacing electrode, cardiac venous system, for left ventricular pacing, at time of insertion of pacing cardioverter-defibrillator or pacemaker pulse generator [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]) with documentation that the patient had moderate to severe congestive heart failure (CHF).
 
Part B carrier Noridian Administrative Services released a policy in 2003 stating that it would cover 33224-33226 for patients with "moderate to severe congestive heart failure (CHF)." Patients must also have "an electrical conduction disturbance in the heart that causes the ventricles to contract asynchronously," and not be likely to improve with additional drug therapy, Noridian said.
 
Problem: Noridian denies your claim, saying that you had to document that the patients had class III or IV heart failure, even though its policy only stated "moderate to severe CHF."
 
The Noridian reviewer admitted that the carrier's policy didn't specify class III or IV heart failure, according to Rebecca Caux, senior coding specialist with Iowa Heart Center (IHC) who met with this problem. But Noridian argued that the term "moderate to severe" meant the same thing as class III or IV heart failure. In the end, IHC changed its documentation to satisfy Noridian. Focus on Your Diagnosis Codes The Noridian policy may not specify class III or IV heart failure, but it does call for ICD-9 codes 428.0 through 428.9, says Jennifer Kelchen, MA, CCS-P, manager of the coding department for Cardiologists PC in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Those ICD-9 codes should be enough to tell you that the heart failure must be class III or IV.
 
Tip: To document class III or IV heart failure, you should look for items in the patient's heart such as prolonged QRS duration on the patient's electrocardiogram, typically 135 ms or longer, Kelchen says. Often, an electrophysiologist's report will state "class III heart failure" or "acute heart failure," and then you simply have to determine if the heart failure is diastolic or systolic.
 
Important: Note that Noridian changed its policy to require a "conduction disorder," or a heart block, as a secondary diagnosis for 33224-33226. In its Medicare B News bulletin issue 210, dated Feb. 27, 2004, Noridian says your claim must include a secondary diagnosis code of 426.0, 426.3-426.54 or 426.9, Kelchen says. If you don't document a [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All