Case Study:
Pacemaker Repositioning Payment Rests on the Op Report
Published on Tue Aug 01, 2000
Pacemaker leads frequently dislodge for a variety of reasons. The lead itself may not function properly, it may not have been installed correctly; or it can be dislodged by a fall or a sudden move by the patient. When this occurs, the patient must return to the operating room (OR) to have the leads repositioned.
If this occurs more than 15 days after the pacemaker was initially installed, the procedure can be billed using the following codes:
33216 insertion or repositioning of a transvenous electrode (15 days or more after initial
insertion); single chamber (one electrode)
permanent pacemaker or single chamber
pacing cardioverter-defibrillator, or
33217 insertion or repositioning of a transvenous
electrode (15 days or more after initial
insertion); dual chamber (two electrodes)
permanent pacemaker or dual chamber
pacing cardioverter-defibrillator.
Because the original implantation has a 90-day global period, modifier -78 (return to the operating room for a related procedure during the postoperative period) would need to be attached to either CPT 33216 or CPT 33217.
If the repositioning occurs before the 15th day of the global period, reimbursement is much harder to obtain, because the descriptors of 33216 and 33217 clearly state that the codes are for repositioning or reinsertion 15 days or more after the original implantation.
Some carriers will reimburse the procedure if the circumstances are unusual and the documentation indicates that the lead became dislodged through no fault of the physician.
That is not the case, however, in this case study.
The original pacemaker implantation took place on Sept. 4, 1999. The patient, who had a pre- and post-operative diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome (ICD-9 427.81), received a dual chamber pacemaker and tolerated the procedure well.
This operative session was coded as follows:
33208 insertion or replacement of permanent
pacemaker with transvenous electrode[s];
atrial and ventricular
71090 insertion pacemaker, fluoroscopy and
radiography, radiological supervision and
interpretation
Note: If fluoroscopy is performed by another physician (e.g., radiologist), it should not be billed.
Five days later, the patient is back in the OR because the atrial lead dislodged.
Operative Report
Preoperative Diagnosis: Dislodgement of atrial electrode; sick sinus syndrome
Postoperative Diagnosis: Same
Operation: Repositioning of atrial electrode
Indications: For treatment of the above
Procedure: The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The pacemaker site was infiltrated with lidocaine. An incision was made through the wound of the pacemaker incision that was done just two days prior. The wound was carefully opened, and the pacemaker was explanted. The atrial electrode was then disconnected from the pulse generator and loosened as well as from the subcuticular fascia. The electrode was pulled back slightly to [...]
