Cardiology Coding Alert

Bone Up on the E/M Guideline Distinctions

Determining whether to use the 1995 or 1997 guidelines isn't always easy, but you'll need to know how to use one set or the other because federal auditors expect your practice to comply.
 
Indeed, the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) lists compliance with these guidelines in its 2004 Work Plan as an audit target for physicians, says Don White, OIG public-affairs representative.
 
The good news is that the AMA recognizes these E/M documentation difficulties and is taking action to rid coders of guideline frustration. "The AMA, through the CPT editorial panel, is working on improving the E/M codes so that documentation guidelines are unnecessary," says Michael Beebe, the AMA's director of CPT editorial and information services.
 
But until the current documentation guidelines are retired, coders must attempt to decipher them.
 
To access the 1995 and 1997 guidelines online, go to the CMS site http://cms.hhs.gov/medlearn/emdoc.asp. To see a chart that compares the two guideline sets, go to the same site and click "Resources."
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.