Cardiology Coding Alert

4 Tips Speed Your Unlisted-Procedure Practices

Key: The report should use simple, straightforward languageYou can streamline your unlisted-procedure code claims and ensure your physician gets reimbursed without specific codes by following these four pointers.Tip 1: Describe the Procedure in Plain EnglishAnytime you file a claim using an unlisted-procedure code (for example, 93799, Unlisted cardiovascular service or procedure), you should include a separate report that explains, in simple, straightforward language, exactly what the physician did.Example: Your cardiologist cardioverts a patient by using a patient's internal defibrillator. The cardioversion uses timed impulses to convert an arrhythmia back to normal sinus rhythm. You try to find a CPT code to represent this procedure, but you can't locate one.You'll likely have to look at the unlisted-procedure code 93799, says Sandy Fuller, CPC, compliance officer at Cardiovascular Associates of East Texas in Tyler.Describe a cardioversion through an implanted device in layman's terms -- your reviewer may not be familiar with cardiology. For instance, your procedure description could read: "An external cardioversion is the application of timed electrical stimuli through the patient's chest with external electrodes."Keep in mind: Insurers consider claims for unlisted-procedure codes on a case-by-case basis, and they determine payment based on the documentation you provide. Unfortunately, claims reviewers frequently do not have a high level of medical knowledge, and physicians don't always dictate the most informative notes.Good idea: You may even want to include diagrams or photographs to better help the insurer understand the procedure. "We highlight or make notes on the actual op report indicating where in the body of the op report the unlisted procedure is being described," says Melanie Uitto, CPC, CMC, coder at the CORE Institute in Sun City West, Ariz.Tip 2: Compare the Procedure to an Existing CodeAn insurer will decide to pay an unlisted-procedure claim by comparing your procedure description to a similar, listed procedure with an established reimbursement value. Rather than leave it up to the insurer to determine which code is the "next closest," you should explicitly make reference to the nearest equivalent listed procedure. After all, the treating physician is best equipped to make this determination. You should also note the specific ways that the unlisted procedure differs from the next-closest listed procedure.Example: Using the same scenario above, in which your cardiologist cardioverts a patient using the patient's internal defibrillator, you should show that "internal" cardioversion is a similar procedure but one in which the cardiologist passes electrodes to the inside of the patient's heart through a transvenous approach. Using a patient's internal defibrillator is somewhat of a hybrid procedure, meaning that you aren't likely to find a regular CPT code to represent it.This will help relate the procedure performed to an existing procedure as support for reimbursement. And explain how [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All