Coding for a Related Procedure
"The key issue with using modifier -78 is being sure that the 'take-back' procedure is somehow related to the initial procedure," says Cecelia McWhorter, BA, CPC, a coder with the physician-billing agency Comp One Services Ltd. in Oklahoma City. "Common examples from a surgical perspective could include a patient returning to surgery to take care of postoperative bleeding after aortic-valve replacement or cardiac tamponade or for an anastomosis leak following a colectomy," McWhorter notes.
B.J. Johnson, CPC, MPC, a member of the National Advisory Board of the American Academy of Professional Coders and a coder in Loma Linda, Calif., explains how two common examples would be coded from an anesthesia perspective:
1. An anesthesiologist places an intrathecal catheter for a patient (62350, implantation, revision or repositioning of tunneled intrathecal or epidural catheter, for long-term medication administration via an external pump or implantable reservoir/infusion pump; without laminectomy). Three hours later, the patient develops a hematoma. Follow-up treatment of the patient would be coded as 62350-78 with a diagnosis of 996.1 (mechanical complication of other vascular device, implant, and graft).
2. The anesthesiologist places a spinal-nerve stimulator (63650, percutaneous implantation of neurostimulator electrode array, epidural). A hematoma develops several hours later. Code follow-up treatment as 63650-78.
Before using modifier -78, coders should check whether the follow-up procedure is part of a staged procedure instead of a separate, related procedure.
Coding for Unrelated Procedures
Procedures using modifier -79 must be unrelated to the original procedure. Unrelated procedures usually involve a different surgery and site, and often have a different diagnosis as justification. Two anesthesia or pain-management scenarios that commonly use modifier
-79 include:
1. An anesthesiologist places an intrathecal catheter for a patient's pain management (62350). Three weeks later, the patient returns to the physician for a joint injection to relieve pain. The joint injection would be coded as 20605* (arthrocentesis, aspiration and/or injection; intermediate joint, bursa or ganglion cyst [e.g., temporomandibular, acromioclavicular, wrist, elbow or ankle, olecranon bursa]) and appended with modifier -79.
2. A patient seeing a pain specialist for a steroid epidural for chronic back and leg pain mentions after the epidural has been injected that he has neck pain. A trigger point is identified and injected. The physician has performed two separate, unrelated procedures. The trigger-point injection would be coded with 20550* (injection, tendon sheath, ligament, trigger points or ganglion cyst) and appended with modifier -79 to indicate that this injection was unrelated to the first.
Coding for Staged Procedures
Staged procedures using modifier -58 are intended to be completed in two or more sessions, whereas procedures using modifier -78 are expected to be completed in a single session. Common examples of surgically staged procedures include two or three procedures for cleft-lip repair, staged excision of a lesion or staged closure of a wound. Johnson says that many coders add modifier -58 to the primary procedure's code and the following procedure's to document they are related procedures.
Keeping the Modifiers Straight
Because modifier -79 describes unrelated procedures, it is more straightforward than -78 or -58. When distinguishing between these two, McWhorter and Johnson say, intent during the planning procedures determines whether modifier -78 or -58 is appropriate for later procedures.
Johnson explains, "If the surgery is planned and is staged, modifier -58 is used. Cases involving modifier -78 almost always involve a complication from the first surgery that requires a second procedure to fix the problem."