Anesthesia Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Choose 00160 for Nosebleed Crosswalk

Question: Our anesthesiologist provided general anesthesia during a morning surgery. Later that day, the patient started bleeding through the nose so the surgeon took her back to the operating room. His notes state "re-exploration nose for control of postop bleeding" and he diagnosed "epistaxis." How should we code anesthesia for the return case (the same anesthesiologist handled both cases)?Answer: When a patient returns to the operating room for post operative bleeding, your diagnosis and a modified procedure code should help explain the situation to the insurance company. Although the diagnosis is indicated as epistaxis, the more correct choice likely is post-operative bleeding (998.11) from the previous surgery as the notes indicate "re-exploration nose."Report the procedure with 00160 (Anesthesia for procedures on nose and accessory sinuses; not otherwise specified) and include modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) to indicate the anesthesia was a separate service from the original procedure. If the payer [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Anesthesia Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.