Advanced Search

Anesthesia Coding Alert

READER QUESTIONS:

Check Procedure for Introducer-Only Coding

Published on Sat Jan 01, 2005

Question: Our physician inserted an introducer, but not the line. How should I code this?


Maine Subscriber


Answer: Coders differ on the best way to handle this situation. Some coders recommend reporting 93503 (Insertion and placement of flow-directed catheter [e.g., Swan-Ganz] for monitoring purposes), which includes both the Swan-Ganz and central venous (CV) lines, unless the physician places them during different encounters or at different sites.
 
However, other coders say you should not bill this as a Swan-Ganz placement because the physician did not "float" a catheter. The physician can insert a Swan-Ganz introducer and use it for central access. It sounds as if the physician did this in your case, so these coders say you should bill it as a CVP line insertion. Verify the procedure with the physician and report the appropriate code from central venous access device insertion codes 36555-36571.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Anesthesia Coding Alert

View All