Advanced Search

Anesthesia Coding Alert

READER QUESTION:

Know Levels to Take Your ROS Up a Notch

Published on Wed Nov 15, 2006

Question: What are the differences among the review of system (ROS) levels?
  

Kentucky Subscriber


Answer: Four ROS levels contribute to the level of history selected for an E/M service. ROS progresses from "nonavailable" to "problem-pertinent" to "extended" and "complete."

In a problem-pertinent ROS, your physician asks questions about the system directly related to the problem the patient identified in the history of present illness (HPI).

When the physician asks about a limited number of additional systems, he meets the criteria for an extended ROS. Important: Documentation must include positive responses and pertinent negatives for two to nine systems, according to CMS' 1995 Documentation Guidelines for E/M Services.

A complete ROS requires inquiring about all body systems. The physician must review at least 10 organ systems and individually document those systems with positive responses and pertinent negatives.

Tip: For the remaining systems, your physician can use a notation to indicate that all other systems are negative. Without such a notation, he must individually document at least 10 systems.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Anesthesia Coding Alert

View All