Anesthesia Coding Alert

READER QUESTION:

Know Levels to Take Your ROS Up a Notch

Question: What are the differences among the review of system (ROS) levels?
  

Kentucky Subscriber


Answer: Four ROS levels contribute to the level of history selected for an E/M service. ROS progresses from "nonavailable" to "problem-pertinent" to "extended" and "complete."

In a problem-pertinent ROS, your physician asks questions about the system directly related to the problem the patient identified in the history of present illness (HPI).

When the physician asks about a limited number of additional systems, he meets the criteria for an extended ROS. Important: Documentation must include positive responses and pertinent negatives for two to nine systems, according to CMS' 1995 Documentation Guidelines for E/M Services.

A complete ROS requires inquiring about all body systems. The physician must review at least 10 organ systems and individually document those systems with positive responses and pertinent negatives.

Tip: For the remaining systems, your physician can use a notation to indicate that all other systems are negative. Without such a notation, he must individually document at least 10 systems.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Anesthesia Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.