Anesthesia Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Be Sure L&D Code Captures the Correct Level of Service

Question: I am coding for a patient who did not have labor analgesic. She did have anesthesia for a c-section that converted to a hysterectomy following delivery. I have coded this as 01961 with add-on code +01969. The insurance carrier is denying +01969, stating that a qualifying procedure was not billed. Are these codes not billable together? How should I be billing this?

Oklahoma Subscriber

Answer: Reporting 01961 (Anesthesia for cesarean delivery only) seems to be logical on the surface, but you aren’t coding for a cesarean delivery; you’re coding for a delivery and hysterectomy. Therefore, the better option is 01963 (Anesthesia for cesarean hysterectomy without any labor analgesia/anesthesia care), which will cover a c-section and hysterectomy during same session.

Another note: You also mentioned including +01969 (Anesthesia for cesarean hysterectomy following neuraxial labor analgesia/anesthesia (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure performed)) on your initial claim. When you look at coding guidelines, you’ll see that +01969 is intended for use in conjunction with 01967 (Neuraxial labor analgesia/anesthesia for planned vaginal delivery (this includes any repeat subarachnoid needle placement and drug injection and/or any necessary replacement of an epidural catheter during labor)), not 01961.


Other Articles in this issue of

Anesthesia Coding Alert

View All