Plus: Get ready for incentive pay in September, October, CMS says. If all of your physicians are gung-ho about participating in Physician Quality Reporting Incentive (PQRI) except one or two holdouts who are tentative about the program, you can still go ahead and participate without those practitioners. That's the word according to a CMS-sponsored PQRI conference call earlier this summer. Bottom line: "Each one is separately and individually analyzed for qualification," said Michael Rapp, MD, director of CMS's quality measurement and health assessment group. "That fourth person, however, their charges will not be counted toward the bonus." The Physician Fee Schedule charges for the three participating physicians will count toward the bonus, and the fourth physician's charges won't, he said. Look for Upcoming Bonuses CMS officials addressed the fact that many practices are eager to receive their bonus payments for 2009, noting that e-prescribing incentive payments will be issued beginning in September, while PQRI payments will begin in October, Rapp said during the call. Feedback reports: "It's not necessary for eligible professionals requesting feedback reports on their NPI to register on the Individual Authorized Access to CMS Computer Services (IACS) system to use the alternative feedback report process," she added. "If you're seeking the NPI-level feedback report, you can request them from your carrier or MAC, who will verify that a 2007 rerun or a 2008 PQRI feedback report is available for the requested NPI." You'll receive the report via email within two to four weeks from the CMS system, Kosh-Suber added. Keep in mind: You Can Report Initial Measures Group Twice CMS reps also dispelled confusion during the call regarding whether you must report measures groups consecutively, and fortunately, the answer was that you need not do so. One caller noted that her practice was just getting started with PQRI this year, and reported the preventive care measures group (G8486) on a claim for a patient who told the practice that he had Medicare, but the practice later discovered that the patient did not. Because this was the practice's first attempt to report a claim with G8486 and it turned out to not be applicable to the program, the caller wasn't sure whether they would need to re-start their PQRI efforts all over again, or if CMS would still count the 25 additional patients that were reported through PQRI after that first one. However, Rapp told the caller that she could just report the measures group again on subsequent claims without a problem. "The original reason for that code was to know the first patient that you were reporting on, but when we switched to not having the requirement of consecutive patients, it basically indicates that you want to report on a particular measures group, so you can go ahead and report that code again." The 25 PQRI claims that the practice submitted after the erroneous one will still be counted by CMS toward the practice's PQRI eligibility, Rapp said.