Pain Management Corner:
Recoup Transforaminal Payments With '1' Indicator
Published on Tue Jul 11, 2006
Follow these tips to make refiling bilateral claims easy Last fall, Medicare shocked coders by publishing its Physician Fee Schedule with surgical indicator "0" for some codes for popular procedures -- including transforaminal add-on codes. Now that Medicare has reversed its decision, be sure you're filing claims correctly and getting reimbursed for past claims. 2005 Fee Schedule Threw Coders a Curveball Medicare's physician fee schedule published in October 2005 assigned bilateral surgical indicator "0" to transforaminal add-on codes +64480 (Injection, anesthetic agent and/or steroid, transforaminal epidural; cervical or thoracic, each additional level [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]) and +64484 (... lumbar or sacral, each additional level [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]).
That meant Medicare no longer accepted modifier 50 (Bilateral procedure) for 64480 and 64484, no matter how many injections your provider administered. That was a big hit to groups' bottom lines because the bilateral payment adjustment rule (which allows 150 percent payment adjustments for bilateral procedures) couldn't come into play.
The announcement surprised coders everywhere, including Marvel Hammer, RN, CPC, CCS-P, ACS-PM, CHCO, owner of MJH Consulting in Denver. "I was astounded to say the least, as this change was absolutely contradictory to the CPT parenthetical note: 'Codes 64470-64484 are unilateral procedures. For bilateral procedures, use modifier 50,' " she says.
"Medicare goofed," adds Jann Leinhard, CPC, a New Jersey coding consultant. "There are two injection sites -- left and right. Some providers might use the same needle, but there are two separate, identifiable sites."
Medicare Reverses Its Stance Medicare typically releases its physician fee schedule (MPFS) at the end of the year for the following year; Medicare then releases quarterly updates for changes and corrections to the existing schedule. The 2006 second- quarter update (transmittal 897, change request #4399) announced the error regarding bilateral indicators:
"Also, in the October 2005 update to the MPFSDB, the bilateral surgical indictors were inadvertently changed from '1' to '0' for CPT codes 63035, 63043, 63044, 64480 and 64484. This CR reinstates the bilateral surgical indicators for these codes to a '1' effective Jan. 1, 2006."
There's more: The announcement continues, "Your carrier will adjust their systems and the 2005 MPFSDB to reflect a multiple-procedure indicator of a '0' for CPT codes 20931, 20937, and 20938 ... and a bilateral surgery indicator of a '1' for CPT codes 63035, 63043, 63044, 64480 and 64484."
Indicators Drive Your Reimbursement "The bilateral-surgery indicator in the MPFS defines procedures that may be submitted as 'bilateral' and how reimbursement for bilateral procedures is calculated," Hammer says. She offers information on reimbursement for these procedures in the table below, based on 2006 national Medicare allowed fees; the amounts in parenthesis [...]