Anesthesia Coding Alert

Meet the Challenges of Coding During Spinal Surgery

Coding for anesthesia during spinal surgery can be almost as complex as the surgeries themselves but having thorough documentation of the case and knowing the ins and outs of specific codes can help you master the challenges.

Instrumentation Challenges

"I think the main challenge with coding for spinal column or spinal cord surgery is getting the anesthesiologist to document instrumentation," says Carla Thibodeaux, CPC, anesthesia coder with the physician group Tejas Anesthesia in San Antonio. "Cages, Harrington rods, and anterior or posterior instrumentation may be used for these procedures, and it makes a big difference in reporting the procedure accurately."

Instrumentation is usually placed in the spinal column when stability is important. It can be done on all or part of the spine but tends to be necessary over multiple levels.

Reporting the instrumentation is needed to keep claims accurate, but is also makes a big difference in the physician's bottom line since it adds several units to the procedure's base units. Most codes for anesthesia during spinal procedures have 8-10 base units, but the code for instrumentation during these procedures is a 13-unit code.

For example, instrumentation is sometimes used for spinal procedures such as PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion). Anesthesia for the PLIF procedure has a base value of 8 (code 00630, Anesthesia for procedures in lumbar region; not otherwise specified), but using instrumentation means it qualifies for code CPT 00670 instead (Anesthesia for extensive spine and spinal cord procedures [e.g., spinal instrumentation or vascular procedures]).

If the instrumentation is clearly documented in the patient's record, the anesthesiologist can code with 00670 and charge a total of 13 base units (plus time units) for what normally would have been an 8-unit procedure (plus time). The same substitution applies to procedures such as cervical fusion, when 13 units for code 00670 can be reported instead of 10 units for 00600 (Anesthesia for procedures on cervical spine and cord; not otherwise specified).

"We're trying to communicate with our physicians about this issue, but they often don't mention the instrumentation even though it carries extra units," says Cindy Clark, anesthesia coding supervisor with Anesthesiology Consultants in Savannah, Ga. "Most of the time I learn that instrumentation was used by reading the operative notes."

So if administering anesthesia during procedures with instrumentation makes such a difference in reimbursement, why do physicians often fail to mention it? ACA experts cite these possibilities:

Many physicians don't know that instrumentation carries more start-up fees than the standard procedure. There is usually no difference in anesthesia fees for similar situations a hernia procedure with mesh and one without mesh are paid the same. Because of this, many anesthesiologists don't know that instrumentation in the back makes a difference to their reimbursement. Many physicians may complete procedural paperwork at the start of the case so they can concentrate on intraop-erative care and charting. They may not know that instrumentation was done.

Many physicians don't understand billing and coding, and they just assume that everything will be billed properly.

The solution to these types of problems is often a matter of educating the physicians once they understand the reimbursement issues, they may be more likely to document cases clearly so they can be coded accurately. If the anesthesiologist routinely completes paperwork prior to the procedure, it may be advantageous for him to leave the procedure line on the anesthesia record blank until the procedure ends, and then verify with the surgeon what was done.

Code and Crosswalk Correctly

In addition to noting whether instrumentation was used, ensuring that the procedure is reported with appropriate codes is another spinal coding challenge. The sidebar on page 84 lists some surgical codes that Thibodeaux and Clark frequently use for spinal cases.

With so many surgical CPT codes as options for spinal procedures, it makes sense that there are several corresponding anesthesia codes as well. And although the anesthesia descriptors are straightforward enough, using them correctly can be yet another challenge with spinal procedures.

CPT 2002 lists nine codes for anesthesia during spine and spinal column procedures (00600-00670). The complexity for these codes ranges from 13 base units for 00670 (Anesthesia for extensive spine and spinal cord procedures [e.g., spinal instrumentation or vascular procedures]) to 4 base units for 00635 (Anesthesia for procedures in lumbar region; diagnostic or therapeutic lumbar puncture). The spinal procedure codes listed above cross to anesthesia codes 00600 (Anesthesia for procedures on cervical spine and cord; not otherwise specified), 00620 (Anesthesia for procedures on thoracic spine and cord; not otherwise specified) and 00630 (Anesthesia for procedures in lumbar region; not otherwise specified). Code 00670 should be used instead of these for extensive cases.

Other Complicating Factors

Spinal surgery can include multiple incisions, repositioning the patient, multiple surgeons and more. Having complete documentation of these factors can affect which codes are reported, as well as the number of units charged for the procedure. Good documentation should include notes on the following elements:

  • Patient positioning. Knowing what position the patient was in during surgery is always important, especially when you consider that 00604 (Anesthesia for procedures on cervical spine and cord; procedures with patient in the sitting position) is a 13-unit code as opposed to the 10-unit code 00600, which would be used for patients having the same procedure in the prone position.
  • Blood loss. Spinal surgery involves lots of blood loss, so the surgeon may request hypotensive anesthesia to minimize this effect. Invasive monitors such as A-lines (36620, Arterial catheterization or cannulation for sampling, monitoring or transfusion [separate procedure]; percutaneous) or CVPs (such as 36140, Introduction of needle or intracatheter; extremity artery; or 36488*, Placement of central venous catheter [subclavian, jugular or other vein] [e.g., for central venous pressure, hyperali-mentation, hemodialysis, or chemotherapy]; percutaneous, age 2 years or under; or 36489*, percutaneous, over age 2) would be used to monitor the patient, and would be separately billable.

    Some carriers also pay for anesthesia qualifying modifiers for hypotensive (+99135, Anesthesia complicated by utilization of controlled hypotension [list separately in addition to code for primary anesthesia procedure]) and/or hypothermic (+99116, Anesthesia complicated by utilization of total body hypothermia [list separately in addition to code for primary anesthesia procedure]) techniques during back and spinal cord surgery (hypothermia is used to protect the cord).
  • Correct codes for closed procedures. CPT 2002 does not include a code for anesthesia during closed spinal procedures, although there is an ASA code for it (00640, Anesthesia for closed procedures on cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine). Since CPT does not have a specific code for closed procedures, the best alternative is to report 00300 (Anesthesia for all procedures on the integumentary system, muscles and nerves of head, neck, and posterior trunk, not otherwise specified).
  • Preapproval. Some components of spinal surgery, such as dorsal column stimulators, almost always need prior approval by the carrier. Be sure this is obtained beforehand and documented to help the reimbursement process later.

    Making It Work

    Clark, Thibodeaux and Olsen all report success in coding for most spinal procedures, particularly when you know the carrier's guidelines and have adequate documentation in place. Their top advice: Teach your doctors about the ins and outs of documentation needed for instrumentation and extensive cases, always attach the operative report with your claims to help reimbursement go more smoothly, and encourage your physicians to work with the carrier's medical director to understand individual guidelines.

  • Other Articles in this issue of

    Anesthesia Coding Alert

    View All