Anesthesia Coding Alert

Bottom-Line Booster:

Document Details for Field Avoidance - Little Things Add Up to Extra Units

What statements like 'airway shared with surgeon' mean for your reimbursement

Last month our experts tackled a situation coders aren't always sure how to handle: legitimately increasing a procedure's base units - and your reimbursement - because of field avoidance. But your job as the coder handling these cases doesn't stop with reporting the extra units: You also need to educate your physicians about the importance of great documentation if they want to collect safely for the extra units.

Encourage Detailed Documentation

The patient's chart must have a notation regarding field avoidance before you can add any extra units for it. Some coders say this can be as basic as two items:
 

  • documentation of the procedure itself, because any cases involving the patient's head, neck or shoulder girdle have a good chance of including field avoidance; or
     
  • notes regarding the patient's position during surgery (such as prone), because this could cause the anesthesiologist to have difficulty accessing the patient's airway if problems arise.

    However, other coders say you need more details before jumping to conclusions about field avoidance.
     
    Example: If the chart states that the surgeon turned the table during surgery, these coders prefer that the anesthesiologist also include information about how the surgeon actually turned the table. They say that notes such as "Table turned to surgeon," "Airway shared with surgeon" or "Head and airway draped out" can be sufficient documentation to merit charging extra units.
     
    But some experts, such as Leslie S. Johnson, CCS-P, CPC, an anesthesia coder with Medical Income Concepts Inc., in Houston, look for even more details. She wants to know the distance the surgeon turned the table (such as "Table turned 45 degrees" or "HOB [head of bed] 180 degrees"). "If the degrees aren't stated, I don't bill field avoidance even if the record says, 'Table turned,' " she says.
     
    This certainly is a safe standpoint, but other coders aren't sure such details are necessary - partly because other information such as the procedure itself or the patient's position can indicate field avoidance, says Karen Glancy, CCS-P, director of coding with Anesthesia Management Partners in Chicago.
     
    "The ASA description regarding field avoidance also states that 'any position other than supine or lithotomy' also qualifies for these extra units," Glancy says. "Documentation of them can be sufficient to support billing for field avoidance."
     
    Cases that might qualify for field avoidance because of the patient's position can include:
     

  • shoulder or elbow tendon procedures such as 23330 (Removal of foreign body, shoulder; subcutaneous). This crosses to anesthesia code 00400 (Anesthesia for procedures on the integumentary system on the extremities, anterior trunk and perineum; not otherwise specified), which is 3 base units. The procedure qualifies for extra units (a total of 5) if the patient is in a lateral or sitting position.
     
  • procedures when the patient is lying prone (face-down), such as removing a calcaneal growth while the patient is in the prone positions. Report this with 01480 (Anesthesia for open procedures on bones of lower leg, ankle and foot; not otherwise specified). The procedure usually is 3 base units but qualifies for 5 because of the patient's position.
     
    Most anesthesia records have a place for the doctor to indicate the patient's position; if not, the table turning is a good indication of position. You must consider all of the available information (such as the patient's position and where on the body the procedure is performed) to determine whether coding for field avoidance is appropriate.
     
    Tip: When you code for field avoidance, many coders recommend that you document it in Box 19 so the carrier knows why you're billing extra units. 
     "I recommend anything that might help speed up payment," Johnson says. "If putting a note in Box 19 helps, I would try it. However, there's never a guarantee that this will help you get paid for the extra units."
     
    Some coders also recommend using modifier -22 (Unusual procedural services) as another way to explain the situation. Appending modifier -22 indicates that the physician performed a higher level of service than generally required for the code you report. Most field avoidance cases should qualify as "unusual procedural service" because of the extra units you report.

    Cater to Carriers' Unique Criteria

    Some carriers - such as Medicare and many Blue Cross or Blue Shield carriers - don't reimburse extra units for field avoidance. Medicaid's stance on field avoidance seems to vary by region. But don't give up hope, because some commercial carriers - such as Better Health Plans of Tennessee - will pay.
     
    Even carriers that pay for field avoidance have different criteria for submitting your claims.
     
    Example: Better Health Plans of Tennessee wants a paper claim for field avoidance. Some carriers want a modifier and no paperwork; others want no modifier but the term "field avoidance" or something similar somewhere on the claim.
     
    This wide range of policies is why Glancy and Johnson stress the importance of talking to individual payers. You're searching for information related to four key areas:
     

  • whether the carrier in question has a policy regarding field avoidance
     
  • what the policy is
     
  • whether your contract with the carrier states that payment for "field avoidance" or "patient position" will be paid
     
  • how to code correctly for field avoidance according to the carrier's guidelines.

    Get It in Writing

    Your final step in learning how to code for a particular carrier involves getting a copy of the policy in writing. "This avoids confusion and helps maintain compliance," Johnson says. "It also saves you time with appeals if you already have information in writing from the carrier."
     
    Is all of this paperwork worth the extra bit of reimbursement you might recoup? Yes, according to Johnson and Glancy.
     
    "If the anesthesiologist (or CRNA) will document the degree of field avoidance, he stands to gain up to 2 extra base units for his fee," Johnson says. "This might not seem like a lot, but after a while it adds up."
     
    "I think it is difficult to get paid for field avoidance," Glancy says. "But if you're contracted with an insurance plan and can get it written into your contract, it will increase reimbursement."

  • Other Articles in this issue of

    Anesthesia Coding Alert

    View All