Allergy Coding Alert
Share |

You Be the Coder: Preliminary Diagnosis Versus Test Results



Test your coding knowledge. Determine how you would code this situation before looking at the box below for the answer.

Question: Which diagnosis should I report with pulmonary function test codes: the diagnosis for which they were ordered or the one revealed by results, or is either correct?

Michigan Subscriber

 

 

Answer: The appropriate diagnosis code is either the reason for the test being ordered or the results of the test, as long as the reason for ordering the test is not "screening."

Medicare pays for the code that describes the outcome of the test as the primary diagnosis. For example, if the patient came in with wheezing and the test determines that the patient was having an acute exacerbation of asthma, you could report 493.02 (Extrinsic asthma; with acute exacerbation) as the primary diagnosis with 786.07 (Wheezing) as the secondary diagnosis.

Medicare prohibits you from reporting any other diagnosis as the primary diagnosis when the original intent was screening, even when the final outcome of the test uncovered a problem or condition. So if the patient did not present with any symptoms and had no personal history of cardiopulmonary conditions but had only a family history of emphysema, the test would be ordered as a screening service (V81.3).

Be aware that only certain circumstances and diagnosis codes will support medical necessity. Documentation should be included to support the test as medically necessary. Local medical review policies spell out in-depth the requirements that must be met for full reimbursement.

For example, the New York state medical review policy says that lung function tests are appropriate under five circumstances:

  • To determine the presence of lung disease or abnormality of lung function
  • To determine the extent of abnormalities and the causative disease process
  • To determine the extent of disability due to abnormal lung function
  • To determine the progression of the disease
  • To determine the type of disease or lesion.

    Medicare excludes screening as an indication for lung function testing from reimbursement and will not reimburse for screening testing. It defines screening as a PFT performed on an asymptomatic patient, with or without high risk of lung disease, without any pre-existing cardiopulmonary condition; studies as part of a routine exam; and studies as part of an epidemiological survey. For example, diagnosis codes that are not covered include many V codes:

  • V70.0 Routine general medical examination at a health care facility
  • V76.0 Special screening for malignant neoplasms of respiratory organs
  • V81.3 Special screening for chronic bronchitis and emphysema
  • V72.82 Preoperative respiratory examination
  • Surveys and clinical research (V70.6, V70.7).

    Be sure to check with the carrier to determine acceptable diagnosis codes to support medical necessity. There are several examples of appropriate ICD-9 codes that will support medical necessity for PFTs:

  • 162.0-162.9 Malignant neoplasm of trachea, bronchus, and lung
  • 466.0 Acute bronchitis
  • 492.0-492.8 Emphysema
  • 493.00-493.92 Asthma
  • 518.81 Acute respiratory failure
  • 780.50-780.57 Sleep disturbances
  • 786.2 Cough
  • 790.91 Abnormal arterial blood gases.

    Don't be tempted, however, to choose one of the above diagnosis codes just because insurers will pay. Fraud penalties are worse than write-offs. With each claim, you must present documentation that supports medical necessity and shows support for the appropriate ICD-9 codes. All studies require an interpretation with a written report. Computerized reports must have a physician's signature. Providers of PFTs must have on file a referral (prescription) with clinical diagnoses and requested tests. You should have all documentation available for Medicare upon request.

     





  • - Published on 2003-03-01
    Read the
    Full Article
    Already a
    SuperCoder
    Member